Project 3 Summary
Rectal health, behaviors and product acceptability.
Anal intercourse is a widely practiced behavior. There is substantial epidemiological
data on its practice and association with sexually transmitted infections (STI)
for men. Substantially less is known about heterosexual anal intercourse practices,
but it is highly prevalent. Development of rectal microbicides will be guided
by providing descriptive data on anal sex, anal health, and the acceptability
of carrier methods for rectal microbicides. Such fundamental information is crucial
for understanding anal microbicide acceptability and use effectiveness.
Specific Aim #1. To describe behavioral features of anal intercourse that will
affect microbicide utilization and administration. There is a dearth of observational
data on the behaviors surrounding anal intercourse. The physical and mechanical
details of behaviors surrounding anal intercourse of 224 men who report practice
of receptive anal intercourse (RAI) in the past month and 224 women who report
practice of RAI in the past 12 months, including both HIV-positive and negative
subjects, will be described. All subjects will undergo a computer assisted interview
to assess behaviors such as physical position, preparation activities, and post-coital
movements involved in anal intercourse as well as peri-sexual behaviors such as
anal hygiene practices, penetration site sequencing, and lubrication usage. These
aspects of anal intercourse will be compared by gender, partner type, location
of sex, and HIV status.
Specific Aim #2.
To assess the level of and predictive accuracy of reported anal
symptomology among women and men who practice anal intercourse and the effect
of anal coitus on symptoms. Little research has been conducted during the AIDS
era on the relationship of sexual practices to anorectal symptoms and clinical
diagnoses, including infections. This information will be critical in discriminating
between anal symptoms related to RAI and those caused by adverse effects of microbicides.
We propose to assess these relationships among 896 women and men (the 448 men
and women described in Aim #1 as well as an additional 224 men and 224 women who
do not report practice of RAI). We will establish baseline anorectal symptomatology
and compare reports between groups and correlate with diagnoses. It is hypothesized
that: (i) individuals who report RAI will report more anal symptoms than individuals
who do not practice RAI; (ii) more individuals who report RAI will have clinical
signs of anorectal conditions than individuals who do not report RAI and (iii)
individuals who report RAI will have a higher prevalence of anorectal STI’s
than individuals who do not report RAI.
Specific Aim #3.
Quantify the acceptability of five different formulation types
of anorectal products among target populations to prioritize formulation options
for delivering a potential rectal microbicide in a pre-sex context. A subset of
individuals recruited for Aims 1 and 2 who report regular RAI will be recruited
for a study of acceptability of microbicide carrier formulation, application methods
and mechanical aspects of microbicide use. They will be asked to sequentially
experiment with different candidate microbicide delivery devices and application
techniques and report on their use.
Project 3 Aims: Milestones
|
Project
|
Specific Aim
|
Milestone
Date
|
Completion
Anticipated
Before
Year 2.5 Review (10/06)
|
|
Project 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aims 1 & 2: Anal
health and behavior study
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject enrollment
starts
|
04/05
|
Yes
|
|
|
Last subject out
|
07/08
|
|
|
|
Preliminary study
report completed
|
06/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aim 3: Microbicide
acceptability study
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject enrollment
starts
|
08/07
|
|
|
|
Last subject out
|
11/08
|
|
|
|
Preliminary study
report completed
|
05/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|